Cancer And The Dirty Electricity Plague
"... The 20th century epidemic of so-called civilization diseases including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes and suicide was not caused by the electrification of lifestyle. A large proportion of these diseases can therefore preventable. " (I) Released in 2000 a study of 44,788 pairs of twins from Sweden, Denmark and Finland, concluded that environmental factors were the initiating event in most cancers. (ii) the strongest contender and the most likely cause is man-made (artificial) electromagnetic radiation. The pieces of the puzzle were finally reconstructed by a groundbreaking study in 2008. Two men helped by a highly qualified school teacher were given unauthorized access to a school where a group of cancer. Threats of illegal invasion of distinguished physician and a letter of reprimand were issued to the teacher. When school teachers filed a complaint, the California Department of Health intervened progressive. Finally, a study was conducted with the highest integrity, and able to break through the bureaucracy and politics that goes with dirty electrical environments. The study showed that the dirty electricity - a potent carcinogen universal - caused cancer in school and that high levels of dirty electricity measured at the electrical outlets in classrooms to accurately predict the risk of cancer from a teacher. Of no surprise, breast cancer was one of 18 cancers in the 137 teachers in this school as the breast tissue is the most sensitive tissue in the body and the most sensitive to artificial (artificial) radiation. It is a very high risk disease today one would think that a possible cause of this disease, let alone probable cause - will be widely disseminated and acted promptly. Unfortunately this is not the case. Why is that a teacher can present testimonies of women for reporting court cases in Canada as a dirty electrical environment can cause breast cancer, but women remain uninformed about the participation of dirty electricity with this health problem threatening? Dirty electricity (DE) is to remove the breasts of women who work in teams with a high risk factor. Our experts are really so uninformed, or is it because breast cancer affects so many women that the information is so widely resisted suggestions of "random change" and "coincidence"? Breast cancer now affects 1 in 7 women, however, when individual cases of breast cancer or groups of breast cancer in women occur several reproductive factors are also taken into account which makes it easier to discount the role of EMF in causing breast cancer. When Professor Bruce Armstrong, who led the research of breast cancer cluster at the ABC studios in Brisbane Queensland was questioned on national television in August 2007 on the frustration of some women who think that the appropriate investigations not carried out before all teams are released, admitted: "It is very important to properly research, and indeed we had a problem with ABC's decision fast enough to lift people out of the place. It meant that Some of the measures that we wanted were not complete, and I understand how women feel in that sense, they do not feel has been done successfully ... "(iii) When, in 2001, three men in a small office developed cancer breast, Dr. Sam Milham testified for men if their courts 2003, arguing that their cancers are caused, at least in part, by the EMF from an electrical vault near a basement office, where men worked. (iv) In 1997, Dr. Thomas Erren, MPH, noted that an association between ELF EMFs and breast cancer is the support in men. (v) Breast cancer in men is rare, usually 1:100,000. In 2008, it was reported that there were 108 breast cancer groups in the U.S. with another currently in San Diego. In Australia, now I realize the events of breast cancer cluster at the ABC television studios Brisbane, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Adelaide Women and Children Hospital in Adelaide, Gin Gin, Western Australia, and groups of breast cancer cases in the Sydney airport and many other places have been informed by women who are worried but are too afraid to call attention to it for fear of losing their jobs. It was virtually impossible for a woman in the Southern United States in the 1940s to develop breast cancer, but when he moved to a town that had electricity, more risks. These groups serve to show cancer what is happening quietly on a daily basis in the lives of all. Adults and children of today have been affected by EMF. Not only the field of power lines and substations that are of concern, dirty electricity is running through the creation of virtually everyone on the planet. This potent carcinogen is invisible and silent, secret and subtle. Many different types of radiation have been artificially created tissue in our daily lives. Dirty electricity explains why professionals and office workers have high rates of cancer incidence. (vi) people in their homes must also be protected. There have been thousands of studies of EMF, more than any other health issue. In 1997, Dr. Erren said that there are more epidemiological studies that link cancer to these fields that environmental smoke snuff. (vii) History has shown that the western world with its vested interests, is slow to inform citizens about toxic agents and help protect them. The pandemic of electricity "dirty" is no stranger to inaction, like asbestos, lead, acid rain, DDT, PCBs and snuff smoking public health issues before it. The asbestos disease was seen by first time around 1900, recognized as an occupational hazard in 1936, however, it was not until 1995 that production, use, import and was banned in Australia. prevails even in our personal environment since the 1973 oil embargo - which changed the way our electrical operated - and the emergence of the computer age, recent research indicates that dirty electricity is the underlying threat of cancer and has been since the beginning of the electrical distribution system. The argument that the fields of electricity can damage has a history replete particularly in the area of breast cancer with careers destroyed and tarnished the reputation of the participation of scientists who have tried to help people, and with so-called experts who have colluded with forces to go against the precautionary principle of public health: first, do no harm. In its assessment of the Journal of the Royal Institute of Public Health in the United Kingdom, Dr. Stephen J. Genuis reported that vested interests have been effective in slowing the EMF restrictive legislation. He also noted that allegations of environmental damage have been questioned by researchers who failed to disclose covert relations with industry, economic interests exert undue influence in medical journals, and Some publishers and magazine staff have abolished the publication of scientific results that are adverse to the interests of industry. (viii) It is now fairly widely accepted that electromagnetic fields (EMF) of electricity (ix) may cause childhood leukemia. (The reason for childhood leukemia has been studied is because the strongest evidence for a type of cancer is that the same type of cancer is significantly higher in children). The conservative WHO EMF classified these as class 2b carcinogen in 2001 based on 6 epidemiological studies of childhood leukemia. Why is it however that the authorities continue to resist so strongly the idea that EMFs can cause breast cancer? There are 18 epidemiological studies (not 6 as in the case of leukemia), showing an increased risk of breast cancer with exposure to EMF at work and, unlike childhood leukemia in experimental studies neither support nor refute the association of magnetic fields for the experimental breast cancer (both in vivo and in vitro) show a cause and effect and the mechanisations about possible courses of action that the leukemia does not. (x) Any study of breast cancer has important implications for all us. Louis Slesin comments that important documents documenting the effects of these electromagnetic fields in the hormone melatonin and drug tamoxifen remained in the WHO EMF project - a 365-page document with more than 1000 references. ( xi) The result of the current report on breast cancer group at the University of California at San Diego will be of interest as Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News comment "which Leeka Kheifets - Professor in Residence, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, which sits on the University of California, Los Angeles - has spent most of his career, either directly or indirectly working for the Electric Power Research Institute, a branch of the electrical industry. There is no doubt dirty electricity is removing our breasts. All women should be informed about the different types of radiation. All women should be informed about why they do not radiate our breast voluntarily and how not to be a trusted recipient. All women should be informed of how to protect themselves in their workplace and at home. All women taking the drug tamoxifen should be informed about the investigation of EMF. All women should be informed of the importance of moving to an area of low voltage in the workplace to prevent breast cancer, if you have breast cancer or are recovering from breast cancer. Two of the three women who developed breast cancer at the Court of Justice for Canada Workplace Bell died after returning to the workplace. Anyone who refused to return to work survived. All women should be informed about why they work in teams puts them at increased risk of breast cancer. Soon realizing that women burning their bras in the movement of the 1970s women could have saved many breasts be removed. Was this an instinctive movement, as the emergence of the computer age has coincided with the dramatic increase in breast cancer? ~ Donna Fisher Editor's Note: This article includes excerpts from two books edited by Donna Fisher, "Silent fields: the growing cancer cluster story when electricity kills ..." Y "quieter areas: cancer and dirty electricity Plague The Missing Link. .." Available from the publisher Joshua Books at http://www. joshuabooks. Com Footnotes: (i) Milham S, historical evidence that the electrification caused the 20th century epidemic of "diseases of civilization" Med Hypotheses (2009), doi: 10. 1016 / J mehy. 2009. 08. 032 (ii) Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, Iliadou A, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M et al. "Environmental and heritable factors in the etiology of cancer: analysis of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark and Finland, N Engl J Med 2000, 343:78-85 (iii) Professor Bruce Armstrong, interviewed at 9 a.m. with David & Kim, Channel 10, Australia, 7 August 2007 (iv) Slesin L, News & Comment, Microwave News, 22 July 2004, also see S Milham, MD, MPH, "A group of cancer male breast collar workers ", Am J Med 2004 Indust Jun10, 46 (1) :86-87 (v) Erren T, MD, MPH," Epidemiological studies of EMF and the risk of breast cancer: A general biological basis ", in: Stevens, Wilson and Anderson, the hypothesis of melatonin, op. cit. , P. 731 (vi) Milham S, historical evidence that the electrification caused the 20th century epidemic of "diseases of civilization" Med Hypotheses (2009), doi: 10. 1016 / J mehy. 2009. 08. 032 (vii) Erren, in: Stevens, Wilson and Anderson, the melatonin hypothesis, op. cit. , P. 729 (VIII) Genuis SJ, "Fielding current idea: exploring the public health impact of electromagnetic radiation", Public Health 2007, doi: 10. 1016 / J puhe. 2007. 04. 008 (IX) extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields - ELF EMF (x) Havas M, Report to the Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal, breast cancer and occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields, expert testimony: Breast Cancer and EMF November 18, 2008 pages 4 -7 (xi) "When enough is never enough: a reproducible effect in 2 mg-12 mg
About Author Donna M. Fisher, chair of Donna Fisher Silent Fields Inc., and CEO of the Donna Fisher Breast Health Initiative, is author of " More Silent Fields: Cancer and the Dirty Electricity Plague aE" The Missing Link..." and can be contacted through her publisher Joshua Books at http://www.JoshuaBooks.com
